The Cost of Goods Not SoldBy Albert D. Bates, Ph.D.
Article Date: 04-01-2010
Copyright(C) 2010 Associated Equipment Distributors. All Rights Reserved.
Striking a delicate balance that results in increasing sales volume without simultaneously increasing expense
One of the realities of management information systems is that they only express what actually happened. In many instances, it is important to understand the financial and operating impact of what didn’t happen. This is especially important with regard to missed sales opportunities.
Given the severity of the recession, many firms are making some major changes in their operations – lowering payroll, reducing inventory levels and tightening credit policies. Such actions have a very pronounced and visible impact on financial performance. At the same time, all of these actions have the potential to decrease sales. Nowhere in the MIS is there a proper entry for the economic impact of sales that are not made.
This report will examine the impact of lost sales on industry profit performance. It will do that by addressing two key issues:
Understanding Sales Sensitivity– An examination of how even modest missed sales opportunities decrease profitability
Rejuvenating Sales Results– A discussion of the alternative approaches available to management to drive higher sales volume without increasing operating expenses
Understanding Sales Sensitivity
It should be noted from the start that incremental sales volume is almost always a mythological creature. The assumption that adding new customers doesn’t increase costs because “the truck is going right by there anyway” always proves inaccurate in the harsh realization that expenses are incurred on every sale.
However, there are a few instances when incremental sales volume is a very relevant and useful concept. This is particularly true in the context of generating additional sales volume from the existing operating structure. That is, selling more of the current product line to existing customers. In such instances, the expense impact, at least with respect to fixed expenses, is negligible.
Exhibit 1 presents financial information for a typical AED member based upon the latest results from the CODB Report. As can be seen in the first column of numbers, the typical firm generates $35 million in sales, operates on a gross margin percentage of 21.5 percent of sales and produces $700,000 in profit, or 2 percent of sales on a pre-tax basis.
Like every firm in every industry, this typical AED member has both fixed expenses and variable expenses. Fixed expenses are overhead expenses that tend to be difficult to shed as sales fall. Variable expenses, including things like commissions, are expenses that rise and fall with sales volume. For analysis purposes, variable expenses are assumed to be 4 percent of sales – a figure that would be reasonably close for most AED members.
In the next two columns of numbers, sales have been increased by 5 percent. The second column reflects a sales increase with no change in either the expense or gross margin structure of the firm. That is, the firm really is selling more of its existing products to existing customers without lowering its prices. Therefore, fixed expenses remain the same while variable expenses rise with sales.
The impact on profits is significant. With a 5 percent sales increase, profits increase by 43.8 percent, from $700,000 to $1,006,250. This clearly demonstrates the sales sensitivity for firms in the industry. Once again, this is all predicated upon finding truly incremental sales volume, something easier said than done.
Unfortunately, the hunt for incremental volume is almost always associated with price reductions to induce the incremental sales. Once price reductions on incremental sales take place, price reductions on almost everything tend to follow. Taking this path easily negates the sales gain.
The final column of numbers examines the gross margin reduction that would exactly offset the sales increase and leave the dollar profit number unchanged. The figures in this column are not intuitive, so they need some additional explanation.
In the second column, sales cost of goods and gross margin were all increased by 5 percent. In the third column, the increase in cost of goods sold associated with more sales stays where it was in the second column, at $28,848,750.
However, prices on the same physical volume are reduced by 0.9 percent, so sales do not reach the $36,750,000 level. Instead, they only increase to $36,430,990. At the lower sales level and the same cost of goods sold, gross margin falls to 20.8 percent of sales.
The net result is that dollar profits do not improve but remain where they were originally. However, the firm is working 5 percent harder to generate the same unit sales. The important message is that incremental sales volume is a wonderful concept when it truly is incremental. However, the opportunities to destroy the profit impact of true incremental sales abound. To be successful, fixed expenses must stay fixed and the gross margin percentage must not fall.
Rejuvenating Sales Results
At first blush, generating incremental sales volume in a sluggish economy would appear to be virtually impossible. The reality, though, is that many of the actions that firms take to diminish the financial burden of the recession actually end up lowering sales. Sometimes not doing things that hurt is as important as doing things that help. Three of these issues are particularly important:
Inventory Reductions– Almost every firm has tried to reduce inventory for cash flow reasons. The almost-universal reality is that sales suffer from an increased frequency of out-of-stock situations. Clearly, firms are caught between an inventory “rock” and a sales “hard place.” While inventory reductions may be necessary, they need to be highly targeted. Blanket cuts in inventory levels or management edicts to cut purchasing must be avoided.
Accounts Receivable Reductions
This follows an almost identical logical process as inventory reductions discussed above. Certainly bad debt problems increase in a down market. However, every reduction in a customer’s credit line is a potential sales opportunity that is missed.
Lag in Add-On Selling
Every salesperson has been beat up by the recession in some way. One result is that the enthusiasm for add-on selling is greatly diminished. The quickest way to drive incremental sales, though, is to cajole or motivate the sales force into making an extra commitment to this process.
Economic conditions have created measurable sales challenges for almost every AED member. In too many cases, though, cash flow challenges have caused firms to make the problem even worse. In particular, reductions in inventory and accounts receivable often hurt sales as much as they help cash flow. In addition, management teams that are stretched thin often do not monitor sales productivity – as opposed to total sales – to the extent that they might otherwise. As a result, sales per salesperson can fall. If these issues can be dealt with directly, some sales relief can be achieved.
The impact on the bottom line can be dramatic.
[ TOP ]